Template:M comp disc EUA Annex Abandonment of Scheme: Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Created page with "There is something elemental and even mystical about a contractual scheme that contemplates its own non-existence, but wh..."
 
No edit summary
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
Line 1: Line 1:
[[Abandonment of Scheme - Emissions Annex Provision|There]] is something elemental and even mystical about a contractual scheme that contemplates its own non-existence, but when an instrument is a product of the law, and has no continuing existence but for the continued onward existence of the law, this is the place you find yourself. The law prescribes what should happen should the law change. This is rather like sober me leaving messages for drunk me to pay attention to later.
[[Abandonment of Scheme - Emissions Annex Provision|There]] is something elemental and even mystical about a contractual scheme that contemplates its own non-existence, but when an instrument is a product of the law, and has no continuing existence but for the continued onward existence of the law, this is the place you find yourself. The law prescribes what should happen should the law change. This is rather like sober me leaving messages for drunk me to pay attention to later.
The {{euaprov|Abandonment of Scheme}} is a classic use of a rare, but among connoisseurs, prized close-out valuation technique: the “[[then I woke up and it was all a dream]]” method where, if things don’t work out, everyone just forgets this while thing happened.
{{Icds}} was keen on this in the {{1992ma}} but, till the {{emissionsdefs}} came a long, hadn’t really revisited it.

Revision as of 06:35, 26 January 2023

There is something elemental and even mystical about a contractual scheme that contemplates its own non-existence, but when an instrument is a product of the law, and has no continuing existence but for the continued onward existence of the law, this is the place you find yourself. The law prescribes what should happen should the law change. This is rather like sober me leaving messages for drunk me to pay attention to later.

The Abandonment of Scheme is a classic use of a rare, but among connoisseurs, prized close-out valuation technique: the “then I woke up and it was all a dream” method where, if things don’t work out, everyone just forgets this while thing happened.

ISDA’s crack drafting squad™ was keen on this in the 1992 ISDA but, till the Template:Emissionsdefs came a long, hadn’t really revisited it.