Repack Anatomy: Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{a|repack|{{Repack programme - FMWD}}}}
{{a|repack|{{Repack programme - FMWD}}}}A starter kit for all you’d like to know about [[repackaging]].
A starter kit for all you’d like to know about [[repackaging]].
{{Helvetica|'''Index''': Click {{font colour|blue|'''ᐅ'''}} to expand:{{cat|repackaging|{{{2}}}|{{{3}}}}}}}
{{Helvetica|'''Index''': Click {{font colour|blue|'''ᐅ'''}} to expand:{{cat|repackaging|{{{2}}}|{{{3}}}}}}}
===The concepts===
===The concepts===

Revision as of 16:25, 1 March 2023

The Law and Lore of Repackaging
Top Trumps®
Financial Weapons of Mass Destruction®



Repack Programme

It’s exotic, it’s Caribbean, it’s transformative — but somehow just not that exciting any more.

Docs Propectus, agreements, supplements, swaps, global notes, side letters galore. Most exciting part: limited recourse. Yes: that exciting. 2
Amendability Bugger all, because of the trust structure. What? You think the Trustee’s going to take a view? 7
Collateral Fully funded. Note is fully collateralised. 4
Transferability In theory unlimited: cleared, dematerialised bearer notes. In practice? Forget about it. No-one wants your home-made espievie notes. 7
Leverage Not really. 3
Fright-o-meter CAYMAN ISLANDS DUDE! In reality, depends what you put in it, but mostly tame. 5

Tell me more
Sign up for our newsletter — or just get in touch: for ½ a weekly 🍺 you get to consult JC. Ask about it here.

A starter kit for all you’d like to know about repackaging.

Index: Click to expand:

The concepts

The Issuer

See also