Template:Dealer polls after LBIE v AGFP: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
The quaint notion that a [[dealer poll]] would, at the point when needed, actually do anything was laid to rest in the 2023 case of {{casenote|Lehman Brothers International (Europe)|AG Financial Products, Inc.||}} which involved the closeout and valuation of a {{ | The quaint notion that a [[dealer poll]] would, at the point when needed, actually do anything was laid to rest in the 2023 case of {{casenote|Lehman Brothers International (Europe)|AG Financial Products, Inc.||}} which involved the closeout and valuation of a {{1992isda}} following of [[Lehman]]’ collapse. This case is an object less on for many unacknowledged facts about derivatives trading — such as that cases involving can take 15 years to get to judgment — | ||
Revision as of 08:32, 21 April 2023
The quaint notion that a dealer poll would, at the point when needed, actually do anything was laid to rest in the 2023 case of Lehman Brothers International (Europe) v AG Financial Products, Inc. which involved the closeout and valuation of a 1992 ISDA following of Lehman’ collapse. This case is an object less on for many unacknowledged facts about derivatives trading — such as that cases involving can take 15 years to get to judgment —