Template:M summ Credit Derivatives 4.5: Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Created page with "Note the contraction in scope brought about by the narrowly-tailored credit event annex. ===Differences with Section {{isdaprov|5..."
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
 
No edit summary
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
Line 1: Line 1:
[[4.5 - Credit Derivatives Definitions|Note]] the contraction in scope brought about by the [[narrowly-tailored credit event]] annex.
[[4.5 - Credit Derivatives Provision|Note]] the contraction in scope brought about by the [[narrowly-tailored credit event]] annex.


===Differences with Section {{isdaprov|5(a)(i)}}===
===Differences with Section {{isdaprov|5(a)(i)}}===
*'''Threshold''': There is a {{cddprov|Payment Obligation}} meaning that the payment has to exceed a threshold. Presumably one indicative of the Reference Entity’s general financial parlousness, but the parties are free to set it where they like. In this regard redolent of {{isdaprov|Cross Default}}.
*'''Threshold''': There is a {{cddprov|Payment Obligation}} meaning that the payment has to exceed a threshold. Presumably one indicative of the Reference Entity’s general financial parlousness, but the parties are free to set it where they like. In this regard redolent of {{isdaprov|Cross Default}}.
*'''Agregation''': Also like  {{isdaprov|Cross Default}}, it contemplates an aggregation of multiple failures perhaps under several {{cddprov|Obligations}}.  Depending on how constrained your Obligations are — usually more so than {{isdaprov|Specified ilIndebtedness}}, which is usually [[borrowed money]] and may even be (unwisely, but still) widened from that.
*'''Agregation''': Also like  {{isdaprov|Cross Default}}, it contemplates an aggregation of multiple failures perhaps under several {{cddprov|Obligations}}.  Depending on how constrained your Obligations are — usually more so than {{isdaprov|Specified Indebtedness}}, which is usually [[borrowed money]] and may even be (unwisely, but still) widened from that.

Revision as of 08:38, 24 April 2023

Note the contraction in scope brought about by the narrowly-tailored credit event annex.

Differences with Section 5(a)(i)

  • Threshold: There is a Payment Obligation meaning that the payment has to exceed a threshold. Presumably one indicative of the Reference Entity’s general financial parlousness, but the parties are free to set it where they like. In this regard redolent of Cross Default.
  • Agregation: Also like Cross Default, it contemplates an aggregation of multiple failures perhaps under several Obligations. Depending on how constrained your Obligations are — usually more so than Specified Indebtedness, which is usually borrowed money and may even be (unwisely, but still) widened from that.