Definier and definand: Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Created page with "{{A|plainenglish|}}{{dpn||n}}In a definition, the label. Compare with ''definand''. Yes, I did just make these terms up. But I loosely translated it from “metaphier” and “metaphrand” in Julian Jaynes’ ''The Origins of Consciousness in the Breakdown of the Bicameral Mind''."
 
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{A|plainenglish|}}{{dpn||n}}In a definition, the label. Compare with ''[[definand]]''. Yes, I did just make these terms up. But I loosely translated it from “metaphier” and “metaphrand” in [[Julian Jaynes]]’ ''[[The Origins of Consciousness in the Breakdown of the Bicameral Mind]]''.
{{A|plainenglish|}}{{dpn||n}}In a definition, the label representing the thing being defined. Compare with ''[[definand]]'', the thing being defined itself.  
 
Yes, I did just make these terms up. But I loosely translated it from “metaphier” and “metaphrand” in [[Julian Jaynes]]’ ''[[The Origins of Consciousness in the Breakdown of the Bicameral Mind]]''.

Revision as of 15:20, 4 May 2023

Towards more picturesque speech
SEC guidance on plain EnglishIndex: Click to expand:
Tell me more
Sign up for our newsletter — or just get in touch: for ½ a weekly 🍺 you get to consult JC. Ask about it here.

Definier and definand
(n.)
In a definition, the label representing the thing being defined. Compare with definand, the thing being defined itself.

Yes, I did just make these terms up. But I loosely translated it from “metaphier” and “metaphrand” in Julian JaynesThe Origins of Consciousness in the Breakdown of the Bicameral Mind.