Template:Isda Affected Transactions summ: Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
Note that for {{{{{1}}}|Additional Termination Events}} and {{{{{1}}}|Credit Event Upon Merger}}, all {{{{{1}}}|Transactions}} are automatically caught, and if you want to capture just ''certain'' {{{{{1}}}|Transactions}}, you’ll need to tweak this definition too.
Note that for {{{{{1}}}|Additional Termination Events}} and {{{{{1}}}|Credit Event Upon Merger}}, all {{{{{1}}}|Transactions}} are automatically caught, and if you want to capture just ''certain'' {{{{{1}}}|Transactions}}, you’ll need to tweak this definition too.
 
But why, really, would you want to capture just ''some'' {{{{{1}}}|Transactions}} in an {{isdaprov|ATE}}? Well, there ''is'' a reason, though it is a fussy one:
 
{{Additional Representations as Termination Events|{{{1}}}}}
 
Mean time, there is a lot more about how pointlessly over-engineered this clause is at the commentary to Section {{{{{1}}}|6(b)(iv)}}, the {{{{{1}}}|Right to Terminate}}.

Revision as of 08:33, 30 May 2023

Note that for {{{{{1}}}|Additional Termination Events}} and {{{{{1}}}|Credit Event Upon Merger}}, all {{{{{1}}}|Transactions}} are automatically caught, and if you want to capture just certain {{{{{1}}}|Transactions}}, you’ll need to tweak this definition too.