Template:M summ IETA Force Majeure: Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
Line 1: Line 1:
[[Force Majeure - IETA Provision|This]] is substantially the same idea as {{euaprov|Settlement Disruption Event}} in the {{emissionsannex}}. Here is our nutshell:
[[Force Majeure - IETA Provision|As per the overview]], {{ietaprov|Force Majeure}} is substantially the same idea as {{euaprov|Settlement Disruption Event}}in the {{emissionsannex}}.  
{{quote|{{Nutshell EUA Annex Settlement Disruption Event}}
 
}}
It is an event that, in each format:
 
*Is beyond the “affected party’s” reasonable control (having taking “all reasonable steps” to control it)
* Renders the delivery impossible to perform, acknowledging that this might be a problem at either end
* It excludes simply not having enough Allowances in your account, even if that is a result of some failure by a responsible official agency to issue Allowances in your account (as part of your annual allocation) or to replace stale allowances with fresh ones
*The hierarchy of Events of Default, Suspension Events and Force Majeure/Settlement Disruption Events is also the same.

Latest revision as of 14:42, 11 July 2023

As per the overview, Force Majeure is substantially the same idea as “Settlement Disruption Event” in the ISDA EU Emissions Annex.

It is an event that, in each format:

  • Is beyond the “affected party’s” reasonable control (having taking “all reasonable steps” to control it)
  • Renders the delivery impossible to perform, acknowledging that this might be a problem at either end
  • It excludes simply not having enough Allowances in your account, even if that is a result of some failure by a responsible official agency to issue Allowances in your account (as part of your annual allocation) or to replace stale allowances with fresh ones
  • The hierarchy of Events of Default, Suspension Events and Force Majeure/Settlement Disruption Events is also the same.