Template:M summ 1994 CSA Cash: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) Created page with "Now one ''tres interessant'' difference between the New York law {{1994csa}} and the English law {{1995csa}} is that the American version only contemplates a single currency. Because there ''is'' only one currency right? This is what it is — to the extent the constituency trading on a NY CSA are US counterparties that will generally be what they want, and even for those who aren’t, that will generally be what they want, or at least are prepared to put up with, but n..." |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Now one ''tres interessant'' difference between the New York law {{1994csa}} and the English law {{1995csa}} is that the American version only contemplates a single currency. Because there ''is'' only one currency right? | [[Cash - NY CSA Provision|Now]] one ''tres interessant'' difference between the New York law {{1994csa}} and the English law {{1995csa}} is that the American version only contemplates a single currency. Because there ''is'' only one currency right? | ||
This is what it is — to the extent the constituency trading on a NY CSA are US counterparties that will generally be what they want, and even for those who aren’t, that will generally be what they want, or at least are prepared to put up with, but note it in any case. If you are a counterparty who funds in another currency, you might thing about using the {{2016nycsa}}, which does contemplate multiple currencies — but ''doesn’t'' contemplate IM, should you be someone who wants to take non-regulatory initial margin. | This is what it is — to the extent the constituency trading on a NY CSA are US counterparties that will generally be what they want, and even for those who aren’t, that will generally be what they want, or at least are prepared to put up with, but note it in any case. If you are a counterparty who funds in another currency, you might thing about using the {{2016nycsa}}, which does contemplate multiple currencies — but ''doesn’t'' contemplate IM, should you be someone who wants to take non-regulatory initial margin. | ||
Revision as of 12:09, 30 August 2023
Now one tres interessant difference between the New York law 1994 NY CSA and the English law 1995 CSA is that the American version only contemplates a single currency. Because there is only one currency right?
This is what it is — to the extent the constituency trading on a NY CSA are US counterparties that will generally be what they want, and even for those who aren’t, that will generally be what they want, or at least are prepared to put up with, but note it in any case. If you are a counterparty who funds in another currency, you might thing about using the 2016 NY VM CSA, which does contemplate multiple currencies — but doesn’t contemplate IM, should you be someone who wants to take non-regulatory initial margin.