Template:M summ EFET Allowance Annex 8.1: Difference between revisions
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[Failure to Transfer - EFET Allowance Provision|An]] overview — written in the sparse text of someone who has been in solitary confinement with only an inexhaustible supply of biros, newsprint, and ''The Gypsy Kings’ Greatest Hits'' piped loudly into her cell non-stop, 24 hours a day, and has taken to documenting settlement provisions by way of drowning out the existential pain — of what happens if someone is meant to deliver you some allowances but, without excuse, | [[Failure to Transfer - EFET Allowance Provision|An]] overview — written in the sparse text of someone who has been in solitary confinement with only an inexhaustible supply of biros, newsprint, and ''The Gypsy Kings’ Greatest Hits'' piped loudly into her cell non-stop, 24 hours a day, and has taken to documenting settlement provisions by way of drowning out the existential pain — of what happens if someone is meant to deliver you some allowances but, without excuse, does not. You might think the [[Buy-In - GMSLA Provision|buy-in]] provisions from a [[stock loan]] might have been a useful model for such a clause; so did I — but EFET’s {{cds}} didn’t and, unfortunately, ''they'' were the ones sitting in the padded cell trying to banish the very living idea of ''Bamboleo''. | ||
So here we are. | So here we are. | ||
In a product annex relating to EU emissions allowances — known in the trade as “EUAs”. would you, by the way, contrive to define something completely different as a “{{efetaprov|UEA}}”? | In a product annex relating to EU emissions allowances — known in the trade as “EUAs”. would you, by the way, contrive to define something completely different as a “{{efetaprov|UEA}}”? | ||
Revision as of 07:27, 11 September 2023
An overview — written in the sparse text of someone who has been in solitary confinement with only an inexhaustible supply of biros, newsprint, and The Gypsy Kings’ Greatest Hits piped loudly into her cell non-stop, 24 hours a day, and has taken to documenting settlement provisions by way of drowning out the existential pain — of what happens if someone is meant to deliver you some allowances but, without excuse, does not. You might think the buy-in provisions from a stock loan might have been a useful model for such a clause; so did I — but EFET’s crack drafting squad™ didn’t and, unfortunately, they were the ones sitting in the padded cell trying to banish the very living idea of Bamboleo.
So here we are.
In a product annex relating to EU emissions allowances — known in the trade as “EUAs”. would you, by the way, contrive to define something completely different as a “UEA”?