Template:M comp disc EUA Annex (d)(ix): Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) Created page with "What ought to be an after thought winds up being a complete mangle. Really, you shouldn’t be suddenly mentioning something as fundamental as consequential losses in an specific product annex to a definitions booklet — and if you do have to mention it, ideally you wouldn’t make such an unholy mess of it — but this is the world we live in." |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
What ought to be an after thought winds up being a complete mangle. Really, you shouldn’t be suddenly mentioning something as fundamental as consequential losses in an specific product annex to a definitions booklet — and if you do have to mention it, ideally you wouldn’t make such an unholy mess of it — but this is the world we live in. | [[No Consequential Loss - Emissions Annex Provision|What]] ought to be an after thought winds up being a complete mangle. Really, you shouldn’t be suddenly mentioning something as fundamental as consequential losses in an specific product annex to a definitions booklet — and if you do have to mention it, ideally you wouldn’t make such an unholy mess of it — but this is the world we live in. | ||
Latest revision as of 16:59, 6 November 2023
What ought to be an after thought winds up being a complete mangle. Really, you shouldn’t be suddenly mentioning something as fundamental as consequential losses in an specific product annex to a definitions booklet — and if you do have to mention it, ideally you wouldn’t make such an unholy mess of it — but this is the world we live in.