Template:M comp disc 2002 ISDA 3: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
There is no “{{isdaprov|No Agency}}” representation in the {{1992ma}}. Part of the ritual of negotiating a 92 ISDA was — in America, we imagine, ''is'' — to put one in, so when those kill-joys on {{icds}} shunted one into the {{2002ma}} it will have really ruined a few people’s days — so much so that, in some quarters, they still use the {{1992ma}} as a standard. Americans, for example. | |||
There is no “{{isdaprov|No Agency}}” representation in the {{1992ma}}. Part of the ritual of negotiating a 92 ISDA was to put one in, so when those kill-joys on {{icds}} shunted one into the {{2002ma}} it will have really ruined a few people’s days — so much so that, in some quarters, they still use the {{1992ma}} as a standard. Americans. | |||
Revision as of 11:10, 24 December 2023
There is no “No Agency” representation in the 1992 ISDA. Part of the ritual of negotiating a 92 ISDA was — in America, we imagine, is — to put one in, so when those kill-joys on ISDA’s crack drafting squad™ shunted one into the 2002 ISDA it will have really ruined a few people’s days — so much so that, in some quarters, they still use the 1992 ISDA as a standard. Americans, for example.