Template:Isda 4 summ: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) Created page with "A hodge-podge of “state the bleeding obvious” rules, breach of some of which justifies (eventual) close-out as a “breach of agreement” — flagrantly breaking the law, carelessly losing one’s regulatory authorisations — and random tax provisions and indemnities, which by and large ''don’t'' justify close-out. ==== Section {{isdaprov|4(a)}} Furnish Specified Information==== {{specified information capsule|{{{1}}}}} ==== Section {{isdaprov|4(b)}} Maintain Aut..." |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
A hodge-podge of “state the bleeding obvious” rules, breach of some of which justifies (eventual) close-out as a “breach of agreement” — flagrantly breaking the law, carelessly losing one’s regulatory authorisations — and random tax provisions and indemnities, which by and large ''don’t'' justify close-out. | A hodge-podge of “state the bleeding obvious” rules, breach of some of which justifies (eventual) close-out as a “breach of agreement” — flagrantly breaking the law, carelessly losing one’s regulatory authorisations — and random tax provisions and indemnities, which by and large ''don’t'' justify close-out. | ||
{{summ part {{{1}}}|4(a)}} | |||
{{ | {{summ part {{{1}}}|4(b)}} | ||
{{summ part {{{1}}}|4(c)}} | |||
{{ | {{summ part {{{1}}}|4(d)}} | ||
{{summ part {{{1}}}|4(e)}} | |||
{{ | |||
{{ | |||
Revision as of 12:24, 24 December 2023
A hodge-podge of “state the bleeding obvious” rules, breach of some of which justifies (eventual) close-out as a “breach of agreement” — flagrantly breaking the law, carelessly losing one’s regulatory authorisations — and random tax provisions and indemnities, which by and large don’t justify close-out. {{summ part {{{1}}}|4(a)}} {{summ part {{{1}}}|4(b)}} {{summ part {{{1}}}|4(c)}} {{summ part {{{1}}}|4(d)}} {{summ part {{{1}}}|4(e)}}