Template:Isda 3(b) sa: Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
Line 1: Line 1:
*An essay on [[Berkeley’s paradox]] — why promising to own up to a breach is a bit ontologically weird.
*{{repprov|No default or potential event of default}} in general.
*{{repprov|No default or potential event of default}} in general.
*[[Representations and Warranties Anatomy]]
*[[Representations and Warranties Anatomy]]
*[[Negative pledge]]
*[[Negative pledge]]

Latest revision as of 16:02, 30 December 2023