Template:Isda 4 summ: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
A hodge-podge of “state the bleeding obvious” rules, breach of some of which justifies (eventual) close-out as a “breach of agreement” — flagrantly breaking the law, carelessly losing one’s regulatory authorisations — and random tax provisions and indemnities, which by and large ''don’t'' justify close-out. | A hodge-podge of “state the bleeding obvious” rules, breach of some of which justifies (eventual) close-out as a “breach of agreement” — agreeing to provide the credit information you have patiently listed in your schedule, flagrantly breaking the law, carelessly losing one’s regulatory authorisations — and random tax provisions and indemnities (providing the necessary tax forms to minimise tax, and pay tax if you don’t) . | ||
These are the ''dull'' agreements — which by and large ''don’t'' justify close-out. | |||
{{summ part {{{1}}}|4(a)}} | {{summ part {{{1}}}|4(a)}} | ||
{{summ part {{{1}}}|4(b)}} | {{summ part {{{1}}}|4(b)}} |
Revision as of 16:59, 30 December 2023
A hodge-podge of “state the bleeding obvious” rules, breach of some of which justifies (eventual) close-out as a “breach of agreement” — agreeing to provide the credit information you have patiently listed in your schedule, flagrantly breaking the law, carelessly losing one’s regulatory authorisations — and random tax provisions and indemnities (providing the necessary tax forms to minimise tax, and pay tax if you don’t) .
These are the dull agreements — which by and large don’t justify close-out.
{{summ part {{{1}}}|4(a)}} {{summ part {{{1}}}|4(b)}} {{summ part {{{1}}}|4(c)}} {{summ part {{{1}}}|4(d)}} {{summ part {{{1}}}|4(e)}}