82,964
edits
Template:M intro technology Better call ChatGPT: Difference between revisions
Template:M intro technology Better call ChatGPT (view source)
Revision as of 12:13, 8 February 2024
, 8 Februaryno edit summary
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) m (Amwelladmin moved page Template:M intro technology Better call GPT to Template:M intro technology Better call ChatGPT) |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
Contrary to modernist wisdom, this, for the most part, is a bad thing. These will be things an experienced lawyer would roll her eyes at, or sanctimoniously tut about, ''but then let go'', in most cases without even recording that the “issue” was even there. This is formalistic fluff, a long way past a seasoned professional’s [[ditch tolerance]]. | Contrary to modernist wisdom, this, for the most part, is a bad thing. These will be things an experienced lawyer would roll her eyes at, or sanctimoniously tut about, ''but then let go'', in most cases without even recording that the “issue” was even there. This is formalistic fluff, a long way past a seasoned professional’s [[ditch tolerance]]. | ||
{{Quote|Q: What is the difference between an [[LLM]] and a [[trainee]]? <br> | |||
<nowiki>A: You only have to punch information into an [[LLM] once.</nowiki>}} | |||
This, perhaps, accounts for that mysterious variance among experienced lawyers. Contract review, end of the day, is an art, not a science. Sometimes you take a point, sometimes you don’t. Some lawyers like the comfort of redundant boilerplate, others cannot abide it. Harbouring different scars, different institutions are fearful about different things. Does it matter that your contract has a [[counterparts]] clause? Does it matter that it ''doesn’t''? | This, perhaps, accounts for that mysterious variance among experienced lawyers. Contract review, end of the day, is an art, not a science. Sometimes you take a point, sometimes you don’t. Some lawyers like the comfort of redundant boilerplate, others cannot abide it. Harbouring different scars, different institutions are fearful about different things. Does it matter that your contract has a [[counterparts]] clause? Does it matter that it ''doesn’t''? | ||
A busy-body LLM that sees everything and cannot take a view gives its master a problem: she has | A busy-body [[Large language model|LLM]] that sees everything and cannot take a view gives its master a problem: she has a pedant on her hands. Officiousness of this kind rubs off, or is beaten out of, junior lawyers as they acquire experience. But LLMs have an insatiable thirst for it. | ||
For what we are fighting here is not bad lawyering, nor bad machines nor bad intentions but ''bad process design''. Supporting it with machinery will make things worse. This is the lesson of the sorcerer’s apprentice. | For what we are fighting here is not bad lawyering, nor bad machines nor bad intentions but ''bad process design''. Supporting it with machinery will make things worse. This is the lesson of the sorcerer’s apprentice. | ||