Template:Csa Transfer of Title comp: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Paragraphs {{{{{1}}}|5(a)}} and {{{{{1}}}|5(b)}} and {{{{{1}}}|5(c)(i)}} is identical in the {{csa}} and the {{vmcsa}}. It is only in Paragraph {{csaprov|5(c)(ii)}} that things start getting a bit funky, as this {{diff|85267|85266}} illustrates. | Paragraphs {{{{{1}}}|5(a)}} and {{{{{1}}}|5(b)}} and {{{{{1}}}|5(c)(i)}} is identical in the {{csa}} and the {{vmcsa}}. It is only in Paragraph {{csaprov|5(c)(ii)}} that things start getting a bit funky, as this {{diff|85267|85266}} illustrates. | ||
Paragraph {{{{{1}}}|5(c)(ii)}} and beyond in the {{vmcsa}} is an utter horror show and is broadly the same as the equivalent provision in the New York law VM CSA. There is a {{diff||}} of that to look at too. | Paragraph {{{{{1}}}|5(c)(ii)}} and beyond in the {{vmcsa}} is an utter horror show and is broadly the same as the equivalent provision in the New York law VM CSA. There is a {{diff|85272|85271}} of that to look at too. | ||
Paragraph {{csaprov|5(c)(i)}} is self-contained. It does not need adjustment in Paragraph {{csaprov|11}}: the reference to “Distributions” in the heading of Paragraph {{csaprov|11(f)}} simply reflects the heading of Paragraph {{csaprov|5(c)}}, and does not imply you need to add anything. | Paragraph {{csaprov|5(c)(i)}} is self-contained. It does not need adjustment in Paragraph {{csaprov|11}}: the reference to “Distributions” in the heading of Paragraph {{csaprov|11(f)}} simply reflects the heading of Paragraph {{csaprov|5(c)}}, and does not imply you need to add anything. | ||
Revision as of 14:59, 8 May 2024
Paragraphs {{{{{1}}}|5(a)}} and {{{{{1}}}|5(b)}} and {{{{{1}}}|5(c)(i)}} is identical in the 1995 CSA and the 2016 VM CSA. It is only in Paragraph 5(c)(ii) that things start getting a bit funky, as this comparison illustrates.
Paragraph {{{{{1}}}|5(c)(ii)}} and beyond in the 2016 VM CSA is an utter horror show and is broadly the same as the equivalent provision in the New York law VM CSA. There is a comparison of that to look at too.
Paragraph 5(c)(i) is self-contained. It does not need adjustment in Paragraph 11: the reference to “Distributions” in the heading of Paragraph 11(f) simply reflects the heading of Paragraph 5(c), and does not imply you need to add anything.