Credit Support Document - ISDA Provision: Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Created page with "Being the document by which {{isdaprov|Credit Support}} is provided by a {{isdaprov|Credit Support Provider}}. Note that a {{tag|CSA}} should '''not''' be treated as a {{isda..."
 
m Text replace - "In a nutshell" to "In a {{nutshell}}"
Line 3: Line 3:
Note that a {{tag|CSA}} should '''not''' be treated as a {{isdaprov|Credit Support Document}}, as it is in fact a {{isdaprov|Transaction}} under the {{isdama}}.
Note that a {{tag|CSA}} should '''not''' be treated as a {{isdaprov|Credit Support Document}}, as it is in fact a {{isdaprov|Transaction}} under the {{isdama}}.


Note also the pitfalls of providing [[Guarantee]]s with respect to individual {{isdaprov|Transaction}}s under an {{isdama}}. In a nutshell, it doesn't work. [[Guarantee|Here's why]].
Note also the pitfalls of providing [[Guarantee]]s with respect to individual {{isdaprov|Transaction}}s under an {{isdama}}. In a {{nutshell}}, it doesn't work. [[Guarantee|Here's why]].


{{isdaanatomy}}
{{isdaanatomy}}

Revision as of 00:09, 30 January 2015

Being the document by which Credit Support is provided by a Credit Support Provider.

Note that a CSA should not be treated as a Credit Support Document, as it is in fact a Transaction under the ISDA Master Agreement.

Note also the pitfalls of providing Guarantees with respect to individual Transactions under an ISDA Master Agreement. In a Nutshell, it doesn't work. Here's why.