Template:Healthcare serial murder capsule: Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Created page with "{{L3}}There is an unusual series of deaths or medical incidents that significantly exceed statistical averages, and for which there is no obvious “innocent” explanation <li>A given carer or medical professional was present for all the incidents<li>There is no reliable direct evidence of the identified carer actually harming any of the patients<li>There are several pieces of ''circumstantial evidence'' that are each consistent with the carer’s involvement in..."
 
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{L3}}There is an unusual series of deaths or medical incidents that significantly exceed statistical averages, and for which there is no obvious “innocent” explanation <li>A given carer or medical professional was present for all the incidents<li>There is no reliable direct evidence of the identified carer actually harming any of the patients<li>There are several pieces of ''[[circumstantial evidence]]'' that are each [[consistent with]] the carer’s involvement in the deaths.
{{L3}}'''Situation''': An unusual increase in deaths or medical incidents to exceed statistical averages for which there is no obvious “innocent” explanation. <li>'''Suspect''': A given carer or medical professional was present for all the incidents.<li>'''No direct evidence''': There is no reliable direct evidence of the identified carer actually harming any of the patients.<li>'''Multiple items of circumstantial evidence''': There are several pieces of ''[[circumstantial evidence]]'' that are each [[consistent with]] the carer’s involvement in the deaths.<li>'''No motive''': The suspect has no apparent motive.<li>'''No prior history''': The suspect has no prior record of violence, antisocial behaviour or mental illness.
</ol>
</ol>

Revision as of 18:45, 3 August 2024

  1. Situation: An unusual increase in deaths or medical incidents to exceed statistical averages for which there is no obvious “innocent” explanation.
  2. Suspect: A given carer or medical professional was present for all the incidents.
  3. No direct evidence: There is no reliable direct evidence of the identified carer actually harming any of the patients.
  4. Multiple items of circumstantial evidence: There are several pieces of circumstantial evidence that are each consistent with the carer’s involvement in the deaths.
  5. No motive: The suspect has no apparent motive.
  6. No prior history: The suspect has no prior record of violence, antisocial behaviour or mental illness.