Template:Isda Credit Support Document premium: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 10:55, 28 August 2024

An English law CSA is not a Credit Support Document...
But a New York law CSA is a Credit Support Document... — AND SERIOUSLY HOW CAN THEY BE DIFFERENT? Is the ’squad just doing this to annoy everyone?
And an English law Credit Support Deed? That’s a Credit Support Document too? — Hang on, does the English Law Credit Support Deed have a different “Credit Support Document” status to an English Law Credit Support Annex? WHAT?! It does?
Guarantees and why Transaction-specific guarantees under ISDA don’t work So much ninjery.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-*{{pjchotlink|An English law CSA is not a Credit Support Document...}}
+{{hbullet|<li>{{pjchotlink|An English law CSA is not a Credit Support Document...}} <li>
-*{{pjchotlink|But a New York law CSA is a Credit Support Document}}... — AND SERIOUSLY HOW CAN THEY BE DIFFERENT? Is the ’squad just doing this to ''annoy'' everyone?
+{{pjchotlink|But a New York law CSA is a Credit Support Document}}... — AND SERIOUSLY HOW CAN THEY BE DIFFERENT? Is the ’squad just doing this to ''annoy'' everyone? <li>
-*{{pjchotlink|And an English law Credit Support Deed? That’s a Credit Support Document too}}? — Hang on, does the English Law Credit Support ''Deed'' have a different “Credit Support Document” status to an English Law Credit Support ''Annex''? WHAT?! It ''does''?
+{{pjchotlink|And an English law Credit Support Deed? That’s a Credit Support Document too}}? — Hang on, does the English Law Credit Support ''Deed'' have a different “Credit Support Document” status to an English Law Credit Support ''Annex''? WHAT?! It ''does''? <li>
-*{{pjchotlink|Guarantees and why Transaction-specific guarantees under ISDA don’t work}}
+{{pjchotlink|Guarantees and why Transaction-specific guarantees under ISDA don’t work}}</ol>
-''So'' much ninjery.
+''So'' much ninjery.}}