Template:Isda 14 summ: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
*{{{{{1}}}|Illegality}} is built out to include the {{{{{1}}}|Waiting Period}} concept (also used in {{{{{1}}}|Force Majeure Event}} come to think of it). | *{{{{{1}}}|Illegality}} is built out to include the {{{{{1}}}|Waiting Period}} concept (also used in {{{{{1}}}|Force Majeure Event}} come to think of it). | ||
*{{{{{1}}}|Set-off}} under Section {{{{{1}}}|6(f)}} is new to the ’02. | *{{{{{1}}}|Set-off}} under Section {{{{{1}}}|6(f)}} is new to the ’02. | ||
====A list of the definitions==== | |||
Here, for handy reference, is a list of all the definitions used in this edition of the {{isdama}}: | |||
{{{{{1}}} Section 14 TOC}} | {{{{{1}}} Section 14 TOC}} |
Revision as of 07:50, 5 September 2024
The basic reason for the differences between the 1992 ISDA and the 2002 ISDA is:
- The whole Loss/Market Quotation farrago (and all that First Method and Second Method nonsense) is unique to the ’92, replaced by {{{{{1}}}|Close-out Amount}} in the ’02. That is also where Reference Market-makers, Settlement Amounts and so on come from.
- {{{{{1}}}|Force Majeure Event}} under Section {{{{{1}}}|5(b)(ii)}} is new to the ’02.
- {{{{{1}}}|Illegality}} is built out to include the {{{{{1}}}|Waiting Period}} concept (also used in {{{{{1}}}|Force Majeure Event}} come to think of it).
- {{{{{1}}}|Set-off}} under Section {{{{{1}}}|6(f)}} is new to the ’02.
A list of the definitions
Here, for handy reference, is a list of all the definitions used in this edition of the ISDA Master Agreement: {{{{{1}}} Section 14 TOC}}