Commission

From The Jolly Contrarian
Revision as of 13:36, 8 January 2016 by Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) (Created page with "Commission is only relevant to an Agency contract. Where a broker acts as Riskless Principal (or any other kind of Principal) there is NO commission: the payment...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Commission is only relevant to an Agency contract.

Where a broker acts as Riskless Principal (or any other kind of Principal) there is NO commission: the payment we call a “commission” is just an additional fee.

Rationale:

  • Agency “Commission”: In a pure agency contract, there is no direct transaction between Agent and Principal, so the only way the agent can be remunerated is by a separate “agency fee”: this is a “commission” calculated on the value of the transaction between Street and the Customer directly to which the agent is not a party.
  • Riskless Principal compensation: In a riskless principal structure there are two contracts: one between Street and Dealer, and between Dealer and Principal. Therefore Dealer may extract a fee by:
    • Mark-up/Mark-down: imposing a mark up/mark down between the two contracts; OR
    • Fee: separately charge a fee, which may be labelled a “commission”.

See also