Template:Ucits delegaton versus aifmd delegation

From The Jolly Contrarian
Revision as of 11:15, 25 July 2019 by Amwelladmin (talk | contribs)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

UCITS Art 22a looks a lot like AIFMD Art 21(11) doesn’t it?

Yes, it does. the textual differences are largely formal, or mutatis mutandis style. The main substantive differences are:

  • A UCITS depositary is not allowed to reuse the UCITS’ assets at all, rather that only with prior notification and consent as under AIFMD;
  • A UCITS depositarymust take all necessary steps to ensure UCITS’ assets aren’t caught up in the bankruptcy estate of an insolvent custodian;
  • Where a non-EEA jurisdiction requires use of a local custodian and no local entities satisfy the delegation requirements, UCITS investors must be notified of the risks of such a delegation and not just the fact or, and circumstances justifying, it.
Retrieved from "https://jollycontrarian.com/index.php?title=Template:Ucits_delegaton_versus_aifmd_delegation&oldid=32041"