Enforcing security

From The Jolly Contrarian
Revision as of 09:15, 19 September 2023 by Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{a|repack|}}Commercial legal eagles know a lot about ''taking'' security and ''granting'' security, but are usually well-clear of the blast radius by the time it comes to ''enforcing'' security. They will talk airily of enforcing security without necessarily having a good practical grasp of what it means. Your first port of call should be the Law of Property Act 1925. One can take possession of the secured property, or appoint a receiver or administrator.")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
The Law and Lore of Repackaging


Comments? Questions? Suggestions? Requests? Insults? We’d love to 📧 hear from you.
Sign up for our newsletter.

Commercial legal eagles know a lot about taking security and granting security, but are usually well-clear of the blast radius by the time it comes to enforcing security. They will talk airily of enforcing security without necessarily having a good practical grasp of what it means.

Your first port of call should be the Law of Property Act 1925. One can take possession of the secured property, or appoint a receiver or administrator.