Template:M summ 2002 ISDA 11

From The Jolly Contrarian
Revision as of 18:05, 27 March 2020 by Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) (Created page with "===An indemnity is all very well ...=== Bear in mind, also, that your operating theory here is that your counterparty is a {{isdaprov|Defaulting Party}} — i.e., it is br...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

An indemnity is all very well ...

Bear in mind, also, that your operating theory here is that your counterparty is a Defaulting Party — i.e., it is broke. So while it’s a fine thing, this indemnity might not be of much practical use.

Not covered in the Close-out calculation?

No. The “Expenses” referred to in this provision would not be captured by the definition of “Close Out Amount” or “Early Termination Amount” because, Q.E.D., they arise only once that amount has been determined and the Non-Defaulting Party is in the process of collecting it.

Stamp Tax and Section 4(e)

In the limited circumstance of default, this section modifies the arrangement for who pays Stamp Tax as set out in Section 4(e) (which says it is the person whose tax residence precipitates it).