Subject to
|
Towards more picturesque speech™
|
A kind of evil twin to “notwithstanding anything to the contrary hereinbefore contained”, “subject to...” is special kind of throat-clearing paddery, any preamble prefaced this way or its flannelesque variants — “subject always to”; “subject to any provisions herein to the contrary”; “subject to agreement to the contrary”; that kind of thing — speaks to nervousness about one’s own drafting, or the sacred right of merchants to make and adjust their commercial arrangements as they see fit — the latter nervousness egged on by the perverse ruling in Rock Advertising Limited v MWB Business Exchange Centres Limited as to the legal effect of no oral modification clauses.
“Subject always to” leaves open the door that other, less fulsomely expressed contingencies might be a bit spotty. Does a mere “subject to” mean things are only “subject sometimes to” — and if so how should one infer when, and when not?