Clunge v Rentier

The Jolly Contrarian Law Reports Our own, snippy, in-house court reporting service. →Go uptown Editorial Board of the JCLR: Managing Editor: Lord Justice Cocklecarrot M.R. · General Editor: Sir Jerrold Baxter-Morley, K.C. · Principle witness: Mrs. Pinterman Common law | Litigation | Contract | Tort | Click ᐅ to expand: Case notes Tell me more Sign up for our newsletter — or just get in touch: for ½ a weekly 🍺 you get to consult JC. Ask about it here.

In the Contrarian’s Bench Division

Clunge v. Rentier [2022] JCLR 60

2022: Oct 31

Lord Justice Cocklecarrot M.R.

Tort — Disclaimer — Financial Advice — Whether Disclaimer Disclaiming Personal Responsibility and Recommending Independent Advice applied to Itself

Motion to strike out proceedings brought by Sir Anthony Clunge, K.C., plaintiff seeking damages in tort for negligent misstatement against Brandon “Chip” Rentier, defendant, relating to statements made on Social Media.

Dame Marjorie Wrigley, K.C. for the appellant
Sir Jerrold Baxter-Morley, K.C., for the respondent

(Cur adv. vult)

Lord Justice Cocklecarrot M.R.: The information revolution has wrought transformations upon our society the like of which have not been seen since Thomas Savory invented the steam turbine in 1698. The internet has, as never before, vouchsafed the capacity to every man, woman and child, to publish to the world whatever pops into their heads. It has had ghastly consequences. Businesses rapidly emerged to take advantage of our natural craving for public approval. Mature professionals in positions of some responsibility cannot take the air without connexion to a device. A notable such “social media” business is Twitter, whereupon the exchange which begs our attention came about.