Inference

From The Jolly Contrarian
Revision as of 07:46, 15 September 2024 by Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{a|crime|}}{{d|Inference|/ˈɪnfərəns/|n|A conclusion derived from existing information by acceptable reasoning. Such as by {{L1}}Deduction, the application of formal logic to valid premises to reach a necessary conclusion: “all cats are mammals; this is a cat; therefore this is a mammal.” <br>Induction, which argues from many past instances to a general predictive forward statement: the sun has risen everyday in recorded history; therefore it will rise to...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Crime & Punishment
Index: Click to expand:
Tell me more
Sign up for our newsletter — or just get in touch: for ½ a weekly 🍺 you get to consult JC. Ask about it here.

Inference
/ˈɪnfərəns/ (n.)

Rationality in decision-making (and by extension, in drawing inferences) is bounded by the information we have, our cognitive limitations, and the time available to make decisions.

Our prior beliefs and probabilities influence our interpretation of new evidence and the inferences we draw or find convincing.

Narrative attraction: Some inferences might be more appealing because they form more coherent, satisfying, or familiar narratives. In a criminal investigation a narrative that suggests a coherent pattern of intentional offending will be more satisfying and coherent then one which suggests an unusual cluster of random events.

This subjectivity doesn’t necessarily invalidate the inferential process, but it prays caution, transparency about our reasoning processes, and openness to revising our conclusions as new information becomes available.

See also