Search results
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
- {{a|people|}}Issuer of [[legal opinions]], supplier of [[inhouse counsel]], pliers of379 bytes (50 words) - 11:53, 8 February 2024
- ...]] is a “[[jimsler]]” man, though he holds nothing against “[[gumizzler]]” people. </ref> — of enunciating “[[GMSLA]]”, the abbreviation for the {{gms462 bytes (68 words) - 11:36, 15 December 2022
- As the marble hunks fell like great meteors into the sea around them the people cried, “hark! [[Chicken licken|The sky is falling upon our heads]]!” In a final irony, none of the people responsible for either the commissioning of the sculpture, its [[negligent]2 KB (247 words) - 16:33, 18 March 2021
- ...Middle-management]] jargon which means to “browse the internet”. What most people do during most [[all-hands conference call]]s and the brazen do during [[me431 bytes (63 words) - 11:36, 18 January 2020
- ...[[reasonable man]], and (in tendency to suggest the collective madness of people who should really know better) the [[hypothetical broker dealer]].535 bytes (77 words) - 09:56, 21 March 2020
- {{a|people|}}The sainted people who, because they are paid purely to worry themselves about [[Chicken Licke1 KB (220 words) - 20:20, 23 October 2023
- * Stupid people are ''worse'' that bandits. At least ''someone'' derives a benefit from ban * We systematically underestimate how many stupid people there are.3 KB (498 words) - 08:46, 1 May 2024
- {{a|people|}}“Never forget [[MF Global]]”: a [[magic incantation]] of similar effe531 bytes (75 words) - 23:28, 8 February 2021
- {{a|people|}}{{d|Compliance officer|/kəmˈplaɪəns ˈɒfɪsə/|n|}}601 bytes (92 words) - 23:32, 9 November 2022
- ...every application of force to object, however ill-advised, we wonder what people think they are establishing by claiming to be “results-driven”. ...e impact on the world, good or ill — in fairness, that’s a great number of people — then you might want to put something a little more specific in your pro2 KB (287 words) - 16:21, 25 January 2023
- ...e law, but to be able to plainly and clearly communicate that expertise to people who are not. Those people are called “[[clients]]”. Clients — even sophisticated ones — [[Q.E1 KB (207 words) - 16:47, 7 May 2023
- ...for example, an [[interest period]]. Of great [[interest]] to the sorts of people who find [[calculation period]]s ''interesting''<ref>There's a fairly weak566 bytes (80 words) - 09:02, 24 September 2019
- ...obligation is to the assignee and not the assignor. This can give certain people the hives, as regards [[AML]] and so on. ...te common to see [[broker]] and service provider contracts refusing to let people assign their rights, at least, not without consent. It isn’t clear why an2 KB (278 words) - 10:24, 1 July 2022
- ...re all, in our way, [[ISDA ingénues]], but really the term is reserved for people that might not know you ''never'' say “[[eye-ess-dee-aye]]” and most ce569 bytes (95 words) - 11:46, 25 February 2020
- {{a|people|}}The financial services equivalent of one of those bossy friends who is al570 bytes (104 words) - 10:26, 23 January 2021
- ...s people|gif|You know it.}} }}{{quote|“I love you, but you are not serious people.” ...reat delamination]], it seems, quietly, that the epic shortage of “serious people” that characterised its first decade seems — somewhat? — to be fading6 KB (954 words) - 08:15, 27 July 2023
- *{{shitmaxim|You do not inspire people by showing them how amazing you are, but by showing them how amazing they a ...appreciate those who lift you up. Be a lifter}} — or, be the one who lets people down and have an equal impact.3 KB (476 words) - 21:21, 29 August 2021
- ...Lehmans]]''. Well, it ''was'', any rate. Who knew that an online store for people living off the grid would outlive a Wall Street behemoth?</ref>.635 bytes (95 words) - 12:06, 23 November 2020
- ...xe]]'' is a [[closed-ended]] [[collective investment scheme]] popular with people who speak French. To be compared with a [[société d’investissement à c343 bytes (47 words) - 16:50, 21 September 2021
- ...r that McKinsey (38,000 staff),<ref>[https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/people-and-organizational-performance/our-insights/how-to-identify-the-right-spans ...a half-hearted commitment to a maximum span of five, from the consultancy “People Puzzles”. Why? Apparently, ''To make performance appraisal easier''. This4 KB (592 words) - 15:24, 21 October 2023