Credit mitigation

From The Jolly Contrarian
Revision as of 13:18, 10 December 2016 by Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) (Created page with "The controversial protections in master trading agreements are there for one reason: To stop you losing money. They’re “''credit mitigants''”: ====...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

The controversial protections in master trading agreements are there for one reason: To stop you losing money. They’re “credit mitigants”:

Events of default

  • If a party fails to pay or deliver things it owes under the agreement
  • Things that increase the likelihood that the party will be unable to do so in the future:
    • The party goes insolvent (or gets close to it)
    • The party’s credit ratings are materially prejudiced (via a merger)
    • The party materially defaults on its contracts with other counterparties
  • Things that undermine the comfort you took as to the party’s creditworthiness:
    • Representations and warranties the party gave turn out not to be true
  • Any of these things happen with respect to guarantors or credit support providers.