Lipkin Gorman v Karpnale Ltd - Case Note

From The Jolly Contrarian
Revision as of 10:18, 4 April 2018 by Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) (Created page with "The modern foundation for the resitutionary action of unjust enrichment. Cass was a partner in the solicitors' firm Lipkin Gorman. Being an authorized signatory on th...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

The modern foundation for the resitutionary action of unjust enrichment.

Cass was a partner in the solicitors' firm Lipkin Gorman. Being an authorized signatory on the firm's trust account, Cass withdrew £220,000 and blew £154,695 of it on wine, women and cards at Karpnale's Playboy Club at 45 Park Lane, London, got found out and did a bolter to Israel.

Cass was brought back and sentenced to three years prison for theft in 1984. Lipkin Gorman sued Karpnale for return of the stolen money. At the time, gambling contracts were contrary to public policy, and therefore void under the Gaming Act 1845.