You have read and understood these terms

From The Jolly Contrarian
Revision as of 18:17, 15 October 2019 by Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{pe}}It’s great isn’t it? Can you just imagine the turtle you’d be looking under to prove this one? :''Sir Jerrold Baxter-Morley, Q.C''.: M’lud, we have conclusive e...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Towards more picturesque speech
SEC guidance on plain EnglishIndex: Click to expand:
Tell me more
Sign up for our newsletter — or just get in touch: for ½ a weekly 🍺 you get to consult JC. Ask about it here.

It’s great isn’t it? Can you just imagine the turtle you’d be looking under to prove this one?

Sir Jerrold Baxter-Morley, Q.C.: M’lud, we have conclusive evidence that the defendant knew of this disclaimer, rendered I might add in FULL CAPITALS on page 346 of the presentation.
Defendant: No I didn't.
Lord Justice Cockle-Carrot M.R.: Didn't you?
Defendant. No, sir. I didn't read it!
Sir Jerrold: BUT IT SAYS HERE “I HAVE READ AND UNDERSTOOD THESE TERMS”!
Defendant: Yes, but I didn't read that either.