Template:M summ 2018 CSD 2(b)

From The Jolly Contrarian
Revision as of 15:54, 7 May 2021 by Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) (Created page with "Some observations about schoolboy errors that, I am afraid to say, readers, rather validate the concern that drafting and even comprehension standards within {{icds}} are off...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Some observations about schoolboy errors that, I am afraid to say, readers, rather validate the concern that drafting and even comprehension standards within ISDA’s crack drafting squad™ are off their historical highs. We may find ISDA’s crack drafting squad™ to be haughty, fastidious and pedantic — not, traditionally, seen as shortcomings even if they make the day-to-day experience in the trenches that much more like the Somme.

But, generally, the Squad’s legal acumen as been beyond reproach: standing waist-deep in mud for months on end is good for a young negotiator.

But in the 2018 English law IM CSD we see the standard slipping. This clause is a good example:

(present or future)”: You can’t, actually, grant a fixed charge over something you haven’t yet delivered into the account you are charging, and which you aren’t yet — by the very theory of the game — even obliged to deliver into that account. How are you supposed to identify with any certainty the future what your Posted Credit Support (IM) is before you’ve posted it, let alone with enough certainty for a fixed charge to attach to it, we can only wonder.