Indent

From The Jolly Contrarian
Revision as of 14:18, 19 April 2023 by Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{a|design|{{subtable| '''{{font|Helvetica}}1 LEVEL 1</span>''' 1.1 '''Level 2''': Lorem ipsum :(a) '''Level 3''': Lorem ipsum ::(i) '''Level 4''': Lorem ipsum ::(ii) '''Leve...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
The design of organisations and products

1 LEVEL 1

1.1 Level 2: Lorem ipsum

(a) Level 3: Lorem ipsum
(i) Level 4: Lorem ipsum
(ii) Level 4: Lorem ipsum
(b) Level 3: Lorem ipsum
(i) Level 4: Lorem ipsum
(ii) Level 4: Lorem ipsum
(A) Level 5: Lorem ipsum
(B) Level 5: Lorem ipsum
(I) Level 6: Lorem ipsum
(II) Level 6: Lorem ipsum
(C) Level 5: Lorem ipsum
(I) Level 6: Lorem ipsum
(II) Level 6: Lorem ipsum

1.2 Level 2: Lorem ipsum

(a) Level 3: Lorem ipsum
(i) Level 4: Lorem ipsum
(ii) Level 4: Lorem ipsum

1.2 Level 2: Lorem ipsum

Index: Click to expand:
Tell me more
Sign up for our newsletter — or just get in touch: for ½ a weekly 🍺 you get to consult JC. Ask about it here.

When constructing a legal document, once you have agreed on a multiple-level numbering system — and you should — for God’s sake indent the different numbering levels. This at a moment discloses the structure and logic of your document. The reader can immediately see the relation of each paragraph to the others.

Most lawyers are intimidated by Microsoft Word’s automatic numbering system, and with good reason: it is fragile, capricious and easily broken. But they still use it. So should you. And once you have semantically organised your tract into a logical structure, do the world a favour and visually organise it that way too.

See also