Template:M summ Credit Derivatives 4.2

From The Jolly Contrarian
Revision as of 10:27, 24 April 2023 by Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) (Created page with "Differences with Section {{isdaprov|5(a)(vii): *Doesn’t cover credit support providers (being an ISDA concept, not hugely relevant...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Differences with Section {{isdaprov|5(a)(vii):

  • Doesn’t cover credit support providers (being an ISDA concept, not hugely relevant to debt securities) or guarantors (but that is converted elsewhere, directly).
  • Simplified provision (d) which is less bothered about who institutes the proceedings, and less particular about the types of formal insolvency process one can go through, so is a bit more “fair large and liberal”.
  • No catch-all “analogous proceedings” rider at the end to sweep up weirdo jurisdictions.