Template:M premium 2002 ISDA 3(c)

From The Jolly Contrarian
Revision as of 07:42, 29 May 2023 by Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) (Created page with "*Absence of litigation representation generally: what is is there fore; what it tries to achieve. *Some perspective seeking: What types of litigation are we talking about here: it is not just ''any old litigation''. *On “enforceability-threatening” and “existentially-threatening” litigation. *The peril of deemed repetition — a potential risk, but really? *On picking battles to fight, ditches to die in, etc.")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
  • Absence of litigation representation generally: what is is there fore; what it tries to achieve.
  • Some perspective seeking: What types of litigation are we talking about here: it is not just any old litigation.
  • On “enforceability-threatening” and “existentially-threatening” litigation.
  • The peril of deemed repetition — a potential risk, but really?
  • On picking battles to fight, ditches to die in, etc.