Template:Isda 2(a)(iii) premium

From The Jolly Contrarian
Revision as of 11:20, 30 December 2023 by Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) (Created page with "*How and when 2(a)(iii) is or, more to the point ''not'', triggered. *The confusion, fear and loathing that can arising from no-one knowing whether 2(a)(iii) applies. *The confusion arising from not knowing when the condition precedent is meant to apply. *The JC’s idiosyncratic theory about why anyone thought 2(a)(iii) was a good idea in the first place. *The JC’s impassioned argument that, even if once upon a time it was, Section 2(a)(iii) is no longer fit for purp...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
  • How and when 2(a)(iii) is or, more to the point not, triggered.
  • The confusion, fear and loathing that can arising from no-one knowing whether 2(a)(iii) applies.
  • The confusion arising from not knowing when the condition precedent is meant to apply.
  • The JC’s idiosyncratic theory about why anyone thought 2(a)(iii) was a good idea in the first place.
  • The JC’s impassioned argument that, even if once upon a time it was, Section 2(a)(iii) is no longer fit for purpose.
  • How Section 2(a)(iii) held up during the sanctions extravaganza when Russia invaded Ukraine (hint: it didn’t help!)
  • How Section 2(a)(iii) operates in the case of non-payment-or-delivery defaults.
  • How corporate buyers of fully paid options might feel about 2(a)(iii) (hint: not happy!) and the sorts of amendments they might think about making if they want to feel happier
  • Why regulators don’t like 2(a)(iii)
  • What the courts think of 2(a)(iii) — in a nutshell, they are confused — plus a table comparing the six major decisions on the clause