Talk:Laws of worker entropy

From The Jolly Contrarian
Revision as of 08:07, 29 May 2024 by Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) (Created page with "====Meetings==== *Define meetings **'''Negotiate''': determine outcome by agreement, with no intermediary (multilateral consensus) **'''Mediate''': determine outcome by agreement through agent (centrally cleared consensus) **'''Arbitrate''': determine outcome by reasoned decision of central agent **'''Elect''': determine outcome by majority vote *You can't clap one handed *Meetings never start on time *The more people in the meeting the less efficient it will be *Th...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Meetings

  • Define meetings
    • Negotiate: determine outcome by agreement, with no intermediary (multilateral consensus)
    • Mediate: determine outcome by agreement through agent (centrally cleared consensus)
    • Arbitrate: determine outcome by reasoned decision of central agent
    • Elect: determine outcome by majority vote
  • You can't clap one handed
  • Meetings never start on time
  • The more people in the meeting the less efficient it will be
  • The more people in a meeting the less effective it will be
  • The more people in a meeting the less likely it is anyone willing say what they think

Systemic confusion

  • Confusion increases geometrically with size. There is an event horizon where confusion overwhelms an organisation’s commercial purpose.
  • Escalations (being formal communications along the ley lines of the organisation) create more aggregate delay, confusion, aggravation and second-order bureaucracy than they resolve.

Tedium

Tedium and confusion are related and may be the same thing viewed from different perspectives.

  • Tedium is a marker for waste or dysfunction:
    • boring activities could generally be done mechanically
    • Boring activities done manually will be done badly or even perversely (definition of perversity: to do something intended for one purpose in a way that has the effect of serving another purpose (principally one’s own)
    • Given the upfront cost of mechanisation, necessary activities that are boring but not mechanised will either be not important, or not properly understood. The former do not matter latter; the latter have the potential to blow up the organisation.

there is an inverse relationship between the amount of time, middle management spend on a task and its overall importance, i, to the organisation

Consensus

Consensus is uninteresting until it turns out to be wrong. The truth debate: “show me relativist in a plane and I'll show you a hypocrite” is to confuse truth and consensus. Plainly a relativist who gets in a plane believes it will fly

Middle management

Middle management understands nothing. The process of of ascending into middle management is to unlearn whatever it is you know.

  • Hence middle managers are susceptible to conjuring tricks, shiny things and new technology. Any sufficiently primitive middle manager will be unable to distinguish a basic chatbot from magic.

Change, progress