1995 Overseas Securities Lender’s Agreement: Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Removed redirect to OSLA Anatomy)
Tag: Removed redirect
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{fwmdtt|nickname=OSLA| imagetype=jpg| tagline= Short? That's not a short. ''This'' is a short!| documentation= {{osla}}. Vague, arcane, outdated and no [[netting aiorbags.| docscore=4| amendability= Bilateral, so yes, in theory — but more likely to tip out and sign up a fresh {{gmsla}}.|amendscore=2| collateral= Yes. Could be stocks, bonds — anything.| collateralscore =1| transferability= bilateral. Homey don’t ride that bus.| transferscore =0| leverage=Fully cash collateralised, but a bonus point for the contra-flow collateral haircut. The ''lender'' net borrows from the ''borrower''. ''Nice''.| leveragescore =1| frightometer= Generally sleepy “pluming of the financial, system” material, but shortsville, generally anacchronistic and no netting, so [[GameStop]] freakout territory.| frightscore=5}}
{{fwmdtt|nickname=OSLA| imagetype=jpg| tagline= Call that a [[short]]? That’s not a short. ''This'' is a short.| documentation= Vague, arcane, outdated and no [[netting]] airbags.| docscore=4| amendability= Bilateral, so yes, in theory — but more likely to tip out and sign up a fresh GMSLA.|amendscore=2| collateral= Yes. Could be stocks, bonds — anything.| collateralscore =1| transferability= bilateral. Homey don’t ride that bus.| transferscore =0| leverage=Fully cash collateralised, but a bonus point for the contra-flow collateral haircut. The ''lender'' net borrows from the ''borrower''. ''Nice''.| leveragescore =1| frightometer= Generally sleepy “pluming of the financial, system” material, but shortsville, generally anachronistic and no netting, so [[GameStop]] freakout territory.| frightscore=5}}

Revision as of 20:17, 9 February 2023

Top Trumps®
Financial Weapons of Mass Destruction®


OSLA.jpg


OSLA


“Call that a short? That’s not a short. This is a short.”


Docs Vague, arcane, outdated and no netting airbags. 4
Amendability Bilateral, so yes, in theory — but more likely to tip out and sign up a fresh GMSLA. 2
Collateral Yes. Could be stocks, bonds — anything. 1
Transferability bilateral. Homey don’t ride that bus. 0
Leverage Fully cash collateralised, but a bonus point for the contra-flow collateral haircut. The lender net borrows from the borrower. Nice. 1
Fright-o-meter Generally sleepy “pluming of the financial, system” material, but shortsville, generally anachronistic and no netting, so GameStop freakout territory. 5

Retrieved from "https://jollycontrarian.com/index.php?title=1995_Overseas_Securities_Lender’s_Agreement&oldid=71745"