And/or: Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
Means “[[or]]”, because “or” includes “[[and]]”.
Means “[[or]]”, because “or” includes “[[and]]”.


{{and}} <br>
*{{and}} <br>
{{or}}
*{{or}}


It's utterly defeatist drafting, because of the presence of that slash. That slash admits that the plain, punctuated words of the English language have defeated you.
It's utterly defeatist drafting, because of the presence of that slash: what does it even mean? That slash admits that the plain, punctuated words of the English language have defeated you.
 
In fact, that slash means - and can only mean - “[[or]]”. So by saying "and or" you are really saying "and, or or". But to be hermetically sealed and consistent, shouldn't you go the whole hog, and say "and, and/or or"?
 
AND DO YOU NOW SEE THE INFINITE REGRESSION YOU HAVE SET IN MOTION?


Never speak of this again.
Never speak of this again.


{{c2|egg|ISIA}}
{{c2|egg|ISIA}}

Revision as of 11:44, 17 August 2016

Means “or”, because “or” includes “and”.

  • And” is a logical operator which gives the value one if and only if all the operands are one, and otherwise has a value of zero.
  • Or” is a logical operation which gives the value one if at least one operand has the value one, and otherwise gives a value of zero.

It's utterly defeatist drafting, because of the presence of that slash: what does it even mean? That slash admits that the plain, punctuated words of the English language have defeated you.

In fact, that slash means - and can only mean - “or”. So by saying "and or" you are really saying "and, or or". But to be hermetically sealed and consistent, shouldn't you go the whole hog, and say "and, and/or or"?

AND DO YOU NOW SEE THE INFINITE REGRESSION YOU HAVE SET IN MOTION?

Never speak of this again.