Awards: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 10: Line 10:
How cynical.
How cynical.
   
   
[[File:LDOTY.jpg|thumb|left|Excellence in complaints management]]Seemingly there are insecurities that only a gong for “[[Environmental Finance Personality of the Year]]” (there really is such a thing); “Business Development Professional of the Year” (there are ''hundreds'' of these) or “In-house Litigation Department of the year” (what does it say about an organisation that lionises its own capacity to [[Make America Great Again|conduct litigation]]?) can redress.
Seemingly there are insecurities that only a gong for “[[Environmental Finance Personality of the Year]]” (there really is such a thing); “Business Development Professional of the Year” (there are ''hundreds'' of these) or “In-house Litigation Department of the year” (what does it say about an organisation that lionises its own capacity to [[Make America Great Again|conduct litigation]]?) can redress.


O! To have existential doubts that can be so easily quashed! If such an award, “judged” anonymously, without reference to published criteria, from amongst nominees whose main merit appears to be employment by a prolific advertiser of the sponsor’s product — if a personal tribute as feeble as ''that'' can assuage your deep insecurities — if that is all it takes to put you back on your keel — your psychological health is rude indeed.
O! To have existential doubts that can be so easily quashed! If such an award, “judged” anonymously, without reference to published criteria, from amongst nominees whose main merit appears to be employment by a prolific advertiser of the sponsor’s product — if a personal tribute as feeble as ''that'' can assuage your deep insecurities — if that is all it takes to put you back on your keel — your psychological health is rude indeed.


Right?
Right?[[File:LDOTY.jpg|thumb|right|Excellence in complaints management]]
{{seealso}}
{{seealso}}
*[[LinkedIn]]
*[[LinkedIn]]