Best execution: Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 34: Line 34:
===See Also===
===See Also===
*{{tag|CESR}} [http://www.esma.europa.eu/system/files/07_320.pdf Question and Answer paper on best execution under MiFID]
*{{tag|CESR}} [http://www.esma.europa.eu/system/files/07_320.pdf Question and Answer paper on best execution under MiFID]
*[[image:Letter-cesr-best-execution en.pdf|Best Execution opinion - European Commission]]
*[[Media:Letter-cesr-best-execution en.pdf|Best Execution opinion - European Commission]]




{{cobsanatomy}}
{{cobsanatomy}}

Revision as of 09:46, 29 September 2014

Best execution is a standard imposed by regulators on the execution of traded financial services products by broker-dealers on nehalf of their clients. It will, therefore, depend to an extent on the jurisdiciton in question, but the general thrust will be consistent wherever it applies.

FCA

According the the FCA in its Thematic Review of September 2014, "Best execution is a core component in the regulation of financial services. Its aims are threefold:

  • to ensure protection for investors,
  • to sustain the integrity of the price formation process (which itself underpins all trading activity) and
  • to promote competition among trading venues in an increasingly fragmented market."

The FCA adopts the European Commission's comprehensive four-fold test to determine whether best execution applies in any particular circumstance to the a firm's activities

European Commission

Extract from Commission Opinion on the scope of best execution under MiFID and the implementing directive: Working Document ESC-07-2007:

4. In our view, the key concept to focus on in interpreting Article 21 is the execution of orders on behalf of clients. This is consistent with the definition in Article 4(1)(5) of MiFID, which refers specifically to a firm acting to conclude agreements to buy or sell financial instruments on behalf of clients, and the description of the relevant investment service in Annex I to MiFID as the "execution of orders on behalf of clients". Both provisions support the idea that the requirement that an order is being executed on behalf of a client is integral to the concept of best execution.


8. The application or otherwise of best execution will depend on whether the execution of the client’s order can be seen as truly done on behalf of the client. This is a question of fact in each case and ultimately depends on whether the client legitimately relies on the firm to protect his or her interests in relation to the pricing and other elements of the transaction – such as speed or likelihood of execution and settlement – that may be affected by the choices made by the firm when executing the order.


The four-fold test

The Commission Opinion sets out a list of the four-fold cumulative test to help determine whether a client is legitimately relying on the firm:

  1. Initiation: Which party initiates the transaction;
  2. Market Practice: Questions of market practice and the existence of a convention to "shop around";
  3. Price Transparency: The relative levels of price transparency within a market;
  4. Available information: The information provided by the firm and any agreement reached.


Initiation
Market Practice
Price Transparency
Available information

See Also


Conduct of Business

This is an article about the FCA’s conduct of business rules, known by its chapter in the FCA Sourcebook, COBS, which implement, among other things, MiFID (directive 2004/39/EC (EUR Lex) and implementing directive 2006/73/EC (EUR Lex)).