Capital introduction: Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(8 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{a|pb|}}The tricky business, engaged in by the “consultancy” arm of a modern [[prime broker]], of putting investors and investment managers together without looking like it was anything to do with you.
{{a|pb|}}There was an urban legend in my town about a seventh former at the local high school who rented out a room in student flat where he and his buddies could take their respective BFFs and GFFS for a bit of healthy slap-and-tickle, away from their parents’ prying and judgmental eyes.  


The name of the game is avoiding looking like a “[[placement agent]]” (that is, appearing to be marketing the fund's securities and thereby taking on [[prospectus liability]]) and to avoid your activity inadvertently bringing the fund in scope for local regulations on hedge funds in a potential investor’s jurisdiction, to which it would not otherwise be subject, and which might apply if it were thought to be offering its securities directly in that locale. Like {{tag|AIFMD}}, for very good example.
It all seems a bit quaint now, doesn’t it — naughty genius, in its way, but of a gentle kind, compared with what kids get up to these days.
 
Now a room in a  Christchurch student in the ’80s cost about forty bucks a week, and there were enough randy high-school seniors that the place was constantly in use. No-one paid more than a fiver and our young entrepreneur made a tidy profit on the side.
 
The guy on the lease eventually got rumbled and was expelled from his school on the gloriously bombastic grounds of “''operating a brothel during school hours''”. Note, fellow lovers of [[The Victory of Form over Substance|form over substance]], that it was not renting the place ''per se'' that sunk him, but doing it ''during double biology'' if you catch my meaning. ''[[Double entendre|Fnarr fnarr]]''.
 
Now what has all this to do with the honourable practice of [[capital introduction]]? Well, analogy: the introducer rents out some space for investors and managers to size each other up, keeps well out of the way, and the benefits accruing to the introducer are just as tangential, and the risks of getting your shape wrong just as catastrophic.
 
“'''Cap intro'''” is the tricky business, engaged in by the “consultancy” arm of a modern [[prime broker]], of putting prospective investors and putative investment managers together — getting them a room, if you like — without looking like it was anything to do with you.
 
The name of the game is avoiding looking like a “placement agent” (that is, appearing to be marketing the fund’s securities and thereby taking on prospectus liability) and to avoid your activity inadvertently bringing the fund in scope for local regulations on hedge funds in a potential investor’s jurisdiction, to which it would not otherwise be subject, and which might apply if it were thought to be offering its securities directly in that locale. Like {{tag|AIFMD}}, for very good example.


{{sa}}
{{sa}}
*[[Prime broker]]
*[[Prime broker]]
*[[Double entendre]]

Latest revision as of 08:30, 6 May 2021

Hedge Funds & Prime Brokerage Anatomy™


There is no industry standard prime brokerage agreement, so this is not so much an anatomy as a collection of resources about an amorphous subject.
Hedge fund | AIFMD | Depositary | Prime broker | prime brokerage agreement | synthetic prime brokerage | margin lending | custody asset | CASS Anatomy | reuse & rehypothecation | hedge fund | leveraged alpha | greeks | short selling Index: Click to expand:

Comments? Questions? Suggestions? Requests? Insults? We’d love to 📧 hear from you.
Sign up for our newsletter.

There was an urban legend in my town about a seventh former at the local high school who rented out a room in student flat where he and his buddies could take their respective BFFs and GFFS for a bit of healthy slap-and-tickle, away from their parents’ prying and judgmental eyes.

It all seems a bit quaint now, doesn’t it — naughty genius, in its way, but of a gentle kind, compared with what kids get up to these days.

Now a room in a Christchurch student in the ’80s cost about forty bucks a week, and there were enough randy high-school seniors that the place was constantly in use. No-one paid more than a fiver and our young entrepreneur made a tidy profit on the side.

The guy on the lease eventually got rumbled and was expelled from his school on the gloriously bombastic grounds of “operating a brothel during school hours”. Note, fellow lovers of form over substance, that it was not renting the place per se that sunk him, but doing it during double biology if you catch my meaning. Fnarr fnarr.

Now what has all this to do with the honourable practice of capital introduction? Well, analogy: the introducer rents out some space for investors and managers to size each other up, keeps well out of the way, and the benefits accruing to the introducer are just as tangential, and the risks of getting your shape wrong just as catastrophic.

Cap intro” is the tricky business, engaged in by the “consultancy” arm of a modern prime broker, of putting prospective investors and putative investment managers together — getting them a room, if you like — without looking like it was anything to do with you.

The name of the game is avoiding looking like a “placement agent” (that is, appearing to be marketing the fund’s securities and thereby taking on prospectus liability) and to avoid your activity inadvertently bringing the fund in scope for local regulations on hedge funds in a potential investor’s jurisdiction, to which it would not otherwise be subject, and which might apply if it were thought to be offering its securities directly in that locale. Like AIFMD, for very good example.

See also