Circle of delegation: Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
That {{t|magic}}al power by which a [[subordinate]] engineers the levers of the [[Parallel universe|universe]] so that the task which she has been assigned falls irrevocably in the lap of her [[line manager]].
How organisations work<br>
How organisations work<br>
[ONE]<br>
[ONE]<br>
Me:  Hi Mary. could I pick your brains today about fee rebates under Mifid 2?<br>
'''Me''':  Hi Mary. could I pick your brains today about fee rebates under Mifid 2?<br>
Mary: Hi Olly, the best person for fees & charges Qs would be either Matthew (Regs Team) or Mark (Legal), since they've followed MIFID II for a lot longer. M<br>
'''Mary''': Hi Olly, the best person for fees & charges Qs would be either Matthew (Regs Team) or Mark (Legal), since they've followed MIFID II for a lot longer. M<br>
[Matthew is out of the office. Let’s try Mark. TWO]<br>
[Matthew is out of the office. Let’s try Mark. TWO]<br>
Me: Mark - Hi - I'm in IB legal - Mary gave me your name. i gather you're an expert on MiFID ii  re fees and charges in AM?<br>
'''Me''': Mark - Hi - I'm in IB legal - Mary gave me your name. i gather you're an expert on MiFID ii  re fees and charges in AM?<br>
Mark: Costs and charges? I'm not the expert! This is under the Investor Protection part of the program. That is run by Luke. <br>
'''Mark''': Costs and charges? I'm not the expert! This is under the Investor Protection part of the program. That is run by Luke. <br>
[Luke is out of the office.]<br>
[Luke is out of the office.]<br>
Me: Great, thanks. Luke seems to be out of the office - does he have a deputy?<br>
'''Me''': Great, thanks. Luke seems to be out of the office - does he have a deputy?<br>
Mark: I think Joan is the business analyst on the costs and charges work-stream ... If she isn’t I think she'll point you in the right direction.<br>
'''Mark''': I think Joan is the business analyst on the costs and charges work-stream ... If she isn’t I think she'll point you in the right direction.<br>
[THREE]<br>
[THREE]<br>
Me: Hi  Joan - Mark tells me you're the business analyst on the costs and charges work stream for MIFID 2? I'm really interested in getting the buy-side view of fee retrocessions and rebates in MIFID 2. Would you have a few minutes to discuss?<br>
'''Me''': Hi  Joan - Mark tells me you're the business analyst on the costs and charges work stream for MIFID 2? I'm really interested in getting the buy-side view of fee retrocessions and rebates in MIFID 2. Would you have a few minutes to discuss?<br>
Joan: Can we do on Friday next week? Can you give some more background on your question.<br>
'''Joan''': Can we do on Friday next week? Can you give some more background on your question.<br>
Me: Actually I was hoping to speak today. A 10 minute call - perhaps with someone in your team? - should help contextualise the question and may indeed answer it.<br>
'''Me''': Actually I was hoping to speak today. A 10 minute call - perhaps with someone in your team? - should help contextualise the question and may indeed answer it.<br>
Joan: Sure. Speak to Andrea.<br>
'''Joan''': Sure. Speak to Andrea.<br>
[FOUR]<br>
[FOUR]<br>
Me: Andrea! Hi! we are investigating the MiFID 2 implications re inducements and conflicts of interest<br>
'''Me''': Andrea! Hi! we are investigating the MiFID 2 implications re inducements and conflicts of interest<br>
I am told by Joan that you're the subject matter expert on this! Would you have a moment to speak today?<br>
I am told by Joan that you're the subject matter expert on this! Would you have a moment to speak today?<br>
Andrea: Hi Olly - I look after the cost and charges disclosures under MiFID II. Anthony looks after inducements. If you are referring to conflict of interest under inducements Anthony would look after that.<br>
Andrea: Hi Olly - I look after the cost and charges disclosures under MiFID II. Anthony looks after inducements. If you are referring to conflict of interest under inducements Anthony would look after that.<br>
[FIVE]<br>
[FIVE]<br>
Me: Anthony! Hi! we are investigating the MiFID 2 implications re inducements and conflicts of interest as we understand these are being considerably tightened up in practical guidance over the MiFID 1 regime notwithstanding the text being quite similar. Andrea tells me that you're the subject matter expert on this! Would you have a moment to speak today?<br>
'''Me''': Anthony! Hi! we are investigating the MiFID 2 implications re inducements and conflicts of interest as we understand these are being considerably tightened up in practical guidance over the MiFID 1 regime notwithstanding the text being quite similar. Andrea tells me that you're the subject matter expert on this! Would you have a moment to speak today?<br>
Anthony: Hi. We have broken the inducements workstream under MiFID 2 into two: non-monetary on one hand and monetary on the other. I look after non-monetary. Monetary is Thomas.<br>
'''Anthony''': Hi. We have broken the inducements workstream under MiFID 2 into two: non-monetary on one hand and monetary on the other. I look after non-monetary. Monetary is Thomas.<br>
[SIX]<br>
[SIX]<br>
Me: Thomas! Hi! we are investigating the MiFID 2 implications re inducements and conflicts of interest as we understand these are being considerably tightened up in practical guidance over the MiFID 1 regime notwithstanding the text being quite similar. Thomas tells me that you're the subject matter expert on monetary inducements! Would you have a moment to speak today?<br>
'''Me''': Thomas! Hi! we are investigating the MiFID 2 implications re inducements and conflicts of interest as we understand these are being considerably tightened up in practical guidance over the MiFID 1 regime notwithstanding the text being quite similar. Thomas tells me that you're the subject matter expert on monetary inducements! Would you have a moment to speak today?<br>
<br>
<br>
Thomas: have you tried Mary?<br>
'''Thomas''': have you tried Mary?<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
Line 33: Line 31:
{{seealso}}
{{seealso}}
*[[Circle of escalation]]
*[[Circle of escalation]]
*[[Invested delegation]]
*[[Inverted delegation]]
{{draft}}
{{draft}}
{{egg}}
{{egg}}

Revision as of 15:36, 25 April 2017

How organisations work
[ONE]
Me: Hi Mary. could I pick your brains today about fee rebates under Mifid 2?
Mary: Hi Olly, the best person for fees & charges Qs would be either Matthew (Regs Team) or Mark (Legal), since they've followed MIFID II for a lot longer. M
[Matthew is out of the office. Let’s try Mark. TWO]
Me: Mark - Hi - I'm in IB legal - Mary gave me your name. i gather you're an expert on MiFID ii re fees and charges in AM?
Mark: Costs and charges? I'm not the expert! This is under the Investor Protection part of the program. That is run by Luke.
[Luke is out of the office.]
Me: Great, thanks. Luke seems to be out of the office - does he have a deputy?
Mark: I think Joan is the business analyst on the costs and charges work-stream ... If she isn’t I think she'll point you in the right direction.
[THREE]
Me: Hi Joan - Mark tells me you're the business analyst on the costs and charges work stream for MIFID 2? I'm really interested in getting the buy-side view of fee retrocessions and rebates in MIFID 2. Would you have a few minutes to discuss?
Joan: Can we do on Friday next week? Can you give some more background on your question.
Me: Actually I was hoping to speak today. A 10 minute call - perhaps with someone in your team? - should help contextualise the question and may indeed answer it.
Joan: Sure. Speak to Andrea.
[FOUR]
Me: Andrea! Hi! we are investigating the MiFID 2 implications re inducements and conflicts of interest
I am told by Joan that you're the subject matter expert on this! Would you have a moment to speak today?
Andrea: Hi Olly - I look after the cost and charges disclosures under MiFID II. Anthony looks after inducements. If you are referring to conflict of interest under inducements Anthony would look after that.
[FIVE]
Me: Anthony! Hi! we are investigating the MiFID 2 implications re inducements and conflicts of interest as we understand these are being considerably tightened up in practical guidance over the MiFID 1 regime notwithstanding the text being quite similar. Andrea tells me that you're the subject matter expert on this! Would you have a moment to speak today?
Anthony: Hi. We have broken the inducements workstream under MiFID 2 into two: non-monetary on one hand and monetary on the other. I look after non-monetary. Monetary is Thomas.
[SIX]
Me: Thomas! Hi! we are investigating the MiFID 2 implications re inducements and conflicts of interest as we understand these are being considerably tightened up in practical guidance over the MiFID 1 regime notwithstanding the text being quite similar. Thomas tells me that you're the subject matter expert on monetary inducements! Would you have a moment to speak today?

Thomas: have you tried Mary?



See also