Collateralised emissions obligations

From The Jolly Contrarian
Revision as of 12:51, 29 July 2022 by Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{a|myth|{{fwmd|Emissions allowance|}}}}Collateralised Emissions Obligation, an apocryphal transaction type that did not, but had it existed, surely would have, precipitat...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Myths and legends of the market
The JC’s guide to the foundational mythology of the markets.™
Top Trumps®
Financial Weapons of Mass Destruction®


Emissions Allowance.png

Emissions Allowance

Wanna stop frying the planet? Start here. Will it help? Who knows? The forward curve is in contango: who cares!

Docs Take your pick: IETA, ISDA or even EFET: none of them good. But at least you have flexibility in mediocrity 4
Amendability Nope. The EU can amend them, but you can’t. 0
Collateral They aren’t anyone’s obligations as such. In fact, they’re more like a sort of unofficial, made up, (hush) crypto. No credit risk! DNA
Transferability With an account at the Union Registry, sure! 7
Leverage Not unless you do a CEmO, and we just made that up. 0
Fright-o-meter Not directly scary as long as there is an EU with Greta Thundberg in it, but global warming is going to lead to Armageddon so, you know, indirectly. 5


Index: Click to expand:

Comments? Questions? Suggestions? Requests? Insults? We’d love to 📧 hear from you.
Sign up for our newsletter.

Collateralised Emissions Obligation, an apocryphal transaction type that did not, but had it existed, surely would have, precipitated a global financial crisis, as carbon traders, hopped-up on absurd amounts of synthetic alpha blew up not just the financial markets but the entgire ecosystem with their leveraged bets on greenhouse gas regulations.