Composition of Combined Consideration - Equity Derivatives Provision: Difference between revisions
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
“Oh, yes you were!” <br> | “Oh, yes you were!” <br> | ||
“Where does it say that?”<br> | “Where does it say that?”<br> | ||
You know where this is heading, don’t you. Come on | Here follows a large pause, wherein negotiator realises that removing the words “, in its sole discretion,” doesn’t achieve anything. | ||
“... Well it doesn't say you ''weren’t'' meant to ask me ...” <br> | |||
You know where this is heading, don’t you. Come on: let's go there, for old time’s sake. | |||
“''Where''?” did I hear you say? I can scarce believe it. | “''Where''?” did I hear you say? I can scarce believe it. | ||
Oh come on, where. [[Video nasty|You know where]]. | Oh come on, where. [[Video nasty|You know where]]. |
Revision as of 13:49, 11 February 2019
Template:Eqderivanat The pedantrous may ask to remove references to the Calculation Agent’s sole discretion. Get your kicks — it’s doubtful that makes any difference: making a determination without specifically saying how you should do it implies you’ll make it up on the fly. What is your counter argument, when the calculation makes a determination you don’t like, meant to be.
“Oh! you used your discretion! you were supposed to ask me!”
“No I wasn’t.”
“Oh, yes you were!”
“Where does it say that?”
Here follows a large pause, wherein negotiator realises that removing the words “, in its sole discretion,” doesn’t achieve anything.
“... Well it doesn't say you weren’t meant to ask me ...”
You know where this is heading, don’t you. Come on: let's go there, for old time’s sake.
“Where?” did I hear you say? I can scarce believe it.
Oh come on, where. You know where.