Contractual mistake: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
*[[Mistake of law]] | *[[Mistake of law]] | ||
*[[Mistake of fact]] | *[[Mistake of fact]] | ||
One thing to be clear: if you make an error what you agree with your counterparty, but your counterparty understands it and agrees it — that’s not a [[contractual mistake]] in a legal sense. It's just your screw up, and you’re stuck with it, barring the good graces of a beneign counterparty who might deign to let you out. You did a bad trade, hotshot. | |||
{{sa}} | |||
*{{isdaprov|Counterparts and Confirmations}} (Section {{isdaprov|9(e)}})in the ISDA master agreement, addressing the question ''who'' is the contracting party and what counts as a mistake. Trader is; settlements and confirmations dude in ops isn't. |
Latest revision as of 11:36, 18 January 2020
An area of contract law beloved of university professors and their students.
One thing to be clear: if you make an error what you agree with your counterparty, but your counterparty understands it and agrees it — that’s not a contractual mistake in a legal sense. It's just your screw up, and you’re stuck with it, barring the good graces of a beneign counterparty who might deign to let you out. You did a bad trade, hotshot.
See also
- Counterparts and Confirmations (Section 9(e))in the ISDA master agreement, addressing the question who is the contracting party and what counts as a mistake. Trader is; settlements and confirmations dude in ops isn't.