Covenant to pay

The Law and Lore of Repackaging Go Premium Repack Anatomy: Hedging exemption | Covenant to pay | Quoted Eurobond exemption | Pre-enforcement | The curious structure of an MTNIndex: Click ᐅ to expand: Repackaging Comments? Questions? Suggestions? Requests? Insults? We’d love to 📧 hear from you. Sign up for our newsletter.

You might wonder what this is all about, especially if you encounter it wrought from the inscrutable curled iron prose of a magic circle capital markets swat team.

So I think it is this. This is reverse engineering logic from text...

There is a trustee for noteholders. The covenant gives the trustee legal standing to sue/act for noteholders on a contract that it is not otherwise party to on the noteholders behalf. That is discharged when issuer pays away to the agent - it has done everything if can do. But if the agent then fails before paying noteholders the obligation springs back. This is so issuer has a loss it can sue the agent for... If it was totally discharged vis a vis noteholders then the (insolvent) agent gets a free pass.

The holding the covenant on trust for noteholders I guess is extra security and allows noteholders to trace funds Vs trustee I'd it does a bolter

But honestly what a shower.

See also

• Signal versus noise