Credit Support Provider - ISDA Provision: Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (1 revision)
 
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
Should a Party to the document, where there is a CSA, be described as a "Credit Support Provider"?
Should a Party to the document, where there is a CSA, be described as a "Credit Support Provider"?


'''No''', sayeth the {{upload|Filename=Users Guide to 1994 ISDA Credit Support Annex.pdf|Description=User’s Guide}} to the 1994 [[ISDA]] {{csa}}:
'''No''', sayeth the [[Users Guide to 1994csa}}:


"Parties to an {{isdama}} should not, however, be identified as Credit Support Providers with respect to
{{quote|"Parties to an {{isdama}} should not, however, be identified as Credit Support Providers with respect to
  the Annex, as such term is intended only to apply to third parties"
  the Annex, as such term is intended only to apply to third parties"}}


{{isdaanatomy}}
{{isdaanatomy}}

Revision as of 12:45, 8 November 2012

Should a Party to the document, where there is a CSA, be described as a "Credit Support Provider"?

No, sayeth the [[Users Guide to 1994csa}}:

"Parties to an ISDA Master Agreement should not, however, be identified as Credit Support Providers with respect to

the Annex, as such term is intended only to apply to third parties"

Retrieved from "https://jollycontrarian.com/index.php?title=Credit_Support_Provider_-_ISDA_Provision&oldid=4310"