Delegation of safekeeping function by depositary - UCITS V Provision: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{ucits5anat|22a(3)}} | {{ucits5anat|22a(3)}} The conditions on which a depsotuary can delegate to — oooh, a [[prime broker]] or something — Or a local custodian in a weird jurisdiction. | ||
{{seealso}} | {{seealso}} | ||
*Article: {{ucits5prov|22(5)}} | *Article: {{ucits5prov|22(5)}} | ||
*[[Depositary]] | *[[Depositary]] | ||
*[[Delegation]] | *[[Delegation]] |
Revision as of 10:30, 28 February 2019
UCITS V Anatomy™
view template
|
The conditions on which a depsotuary can delegate to — oooh, a prime broker or something — Or a local custodian in a weird jurisdiction.
See also
- Article: 22(5)
- Depositary
- Delegation
- ↑ Does this leave the door open for omnibus segregation of different funds managed by the same depositary?