Director of legal affairs: Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "{{a|people|}}We are not quite sure ''what'' a “director of legal affairs” is, if it isn’t just the sort of legal eagle who tells other legal eagles what to do. W...")
 
No edit summary
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{a|people|}}We are not quite sure ''what'' a “director of legal affairs” is, if it isn’t just the sort of [[legal eagle]] who tells other [[legal eagles]] what to do. We think she will probably appear on more than her fair share<ref>Being ''none''.</ref> of [[panel discussions]], and will have a strong view of the revolutionary importance of the firm’s technological solution for [[NDA]]s.
{{a|people|
[[File:Legal affairs.png|450px|thumb|center|The internet doesn’t know, either.]]
}}We are not quite sure ''what'' a “director of legal affairs” is, if it isn’t just the sort of [[legal eagle]] who tells other [[legal eagles]] what to do. We think she will probably appear on more than her fair share<ref>Being ''none''.</ref> of [[panel discussions]], and will have a strong view of the revolutionary importance of the firm’s technological solution for [[NDA]]s.


Possibly someone of great self-importance who can’t have the title [[general counsel]], because there is already one, but wants to have an important title.
Possibly someone of great self-importance who can’t have the title [[general counsel]], because there is already one, but wants to have an important title.

Latest revision as of 14:26, 4 March 2021

People Anatomy™
A spotter’s guide to the men and women of finance.
The internet doesn’t know, either.


Index: Click to expand:

Comments? Questions? Suggestions? Requests? Insults? We’d love to 📧 hear from you.
Sign up for our newsletter.

We are not quite sure what a “director of legal affairs” is, if it isn’t just the sort of legal eagle who tells other legal eagles what to do. We think she will probably appear on more than her fair share[1] of panel discussions, and will have a strong view of the revolutionary importance of the firm’s technological solution for NDAs.

Possibly someone of great self-importance who can’t have the title general counsel, because there is already one, but wants to have an important title.

See also

References

  1. Being none.